Sunday, 24 March 2019

KYC SHORT NOTES:1



KYC SHORT NOTES:1

1.       The objective of KYC/AML/CFT guidelines is to prevent banks/FIs from being used, intentionally or unintentionally, by criminal elements for money laundering or terrorist financing activities.
2.       The PMLA came into effect from 1st July 2005. Necessary Notifications / Rules under the said Act were published in the Gazette of India on 1st July, 2005 by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. The PMLA has been further amended vide notification dated March 6, 2009 and inter alia provides that violating the prohibitions on manipulative and deceptive devices, insider trading and substantial acquisition of securities or control as prescribed in Section 12 A read with Section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act) will now be treated as a scheduled offence under schedule B of the PMLA.
3.       KYC procedures also enable banks/FIs to know/understand their customers and their financial dealings better and manage their risks prudently.
4.       For the purpose of KYC Norms, a ‘Customer’ is defined as a person who is engaged in a financial transaction or activity with a reporting entity and includes a person on whose behalf the person who is engaged in the transaction or activity, is acting.
5.       “Designated Director" means a person designated by the reporting entity (bank, financial institution, etc.) to ensure overall compliance with the obligations imposed under chapter IV of the PML Act.
6.       In terms of PML Act a ‘person’ includes: (i) an individual, (ii) a Hindu undivided family, (iii) a company, (iv) a firm, (v) an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, (vi) every artificial juridical person, not falling within any one of the above persons (i to v), and (vii) any agency, office or branch owned or controlled by any of the above persons (i to vi).
7.       “Transaction” means a purchase, sale, loan, pledge, gift, transfer, delivery or the arrangement thereof and includes- (i) opening of an account; (ii) deposits, withdrawal, exchange or transfer of funds in whatever currency, whether in cash or by cheque, payment order or other instruments or by electronic or other non-physical means; (iii) the use of a safety deposit box or any other form of safe deposit; (iv) entering into any fiduciary relationship; (v) any payment made or received in whole or in part of any contractual or other legal obligation; or (vi) establishing or creating a legal person or legal arrangement.
8.       Banks/FIs should frame their KYC policies incorporating the following four key elements: (i) Customer Acceptance Policy (CAP); (ii) Customer Identification Procedures (CIP); (iii) Monitoring of Transactions; and (iv) Risk Management.
9.       Documents and other information to be collected from different categories of customers depending on perceived risk and the requirements of PML Act, 2002 and instructions/guidelines issued by Reserve Bank from time to time.
10.    Customer Identification Procedure (CIP) : Customer identification means undertaking client due diligence measures while commencing an account-based relationship including identifying and verifying the customer and the beneficial owner on the basis of one of the OVDs
11.    Customer Due Diligence requirements (CDD) while opening accounts
12.    introduction is not necessary for opening of accounts under PML Act and Rules or the Reserve Bank’s extant instructions, banks/FIs should not insist on introduction for opening of bank accounts
1.       Small Accounts If an individual customer does not possess either any of the OVDs or the documents applicable in respect of simplified procedure (as detailed at paragraph 2.3 above), then ‘Small Accounts’ may be opened for such an individual. A ‘Small Account' means a savings account in which the aggregate of all credits in a financial year does not exceed rupees one lakh; the aggregate of all withdrawals and transfers in a month does not exceed rupees ten thousand and the balance at any point of time does not exceed rupees fifty thousand. A ‘small account’ maybe opened on the basis of a self-attested photograph and affixation of signature or thumb print.
2.       a small account shall be opened only at Core Banking Solution (CBS) linked branches or in a branch where it is possible to manually monitor and ensure that foreign remittances are not credited to the account and that the stipulated monthly and annual limits on aggregate of transactions and balance requirements in such accounts are not breached, before a transaction is allowed to take place;
3.       a small account shall remain operational initially for a period of twelve months, and thereafter for a further period of twelve months if the holder of such an account provides evidence before the banking company of having applied for any of the officially valid documents within twelve months of the opening of the said account, with the entire relaxation provisions to be reviewed in respect of the said account after twenty four months.
4.       Where a customer categorised as low risk expresses inability to complete the documentation requirements on account of any reason that the bank considers to be genuine, and where it is essential not to interrupt the normal conduct of business, the bank may complete the verification of identity within a period of six months from the date of establishment of the relationship.
5.       Procedure to be followed in respect of foreign students : Banks should follow the following procedure for foreign students studying in India: 1) Banks may open a Non Resident Ordinary (NRO) bank account of a foreign student on the basis of his/her passport (with visa & immigration endorsement) bearing the proof of identity and address in the home country together with a photograph and a letter offering admission from the educational institution in India. 2) Banks should obtain a declaration about the local address within a period of 30 days of opening the account and verify the said local address. 3) During the 30 days period, the account should be operated with a condition of allowing foreign remittances not exceeding USD 1,000 or equivalent into the account and a cap of monthly withdrawal to Rs. 50,000/-, pending verification of address. 4) The account would be treated as a normal NRO account, and will be operated in terms of instructions contained in the Reserve Bank of India’s instructions on Non-Resident Ordinary Rupee (NRO) Account. Students with Pakistani and Bangladesh nationality will need prior approval of the Reserve Bank for opening the account.

Where the customer is a company, one certified copy each of the following documents are required for customer identification: (a) Certificate of incorporation; (b) Memorandum and Articles of Association; (c) A resolution from the Board of Directors and power of attorney granted to its managers, officers or employees to transact on its behalf and (d) An officially valid document in respect of managers, officers or employees holding an attorney to transact on its behalf
13. Where the customer is a partnership firm, one certified copy of the following documents is required for customer identification: (a) registration certificate; (b) partnership deed and (c) an officially valid document in respect of the person holding an attorney to transact on its behalf.

14.    Where the customer is a trust, one certified copy of the following documents is required for customer identification: (a) registration certificate; (b) trust deed and (c) an officially valid document in respect of the person holding a power of attorney to transact on its behalf.
15.    Where the customer is an unincorporated association or a body of individuals, one certified copy of the following documents is required for customer identification: (a) resolution of the managing body of such association or body of individuals; (b) power of attorney granted to transact on its behalf; (c) an officially valid document in respect of the person holding an attorney to transact on its behalf and (d) such information as may be required by the bank/FI to collectively establish the legal existence of such an association or body of individuals.
16.    Proprietary concerns: (1) For proprietary concerns, in addition to the OVD applicable to the individual (proprietor), any two of the following documents in the name of the proprietary concern are required to be submitted: (a) Registration certificate (b) Certificate/licence issued by the municipal authorities under Shop and Establishment Act. (c) Sales and income tax returns. (d) CST/VAT certificate. (e) Certificate/registration document issued by Sales Tax/Service Tax/Professional Tax authorities. (f) Licence/certificate of practice issued in the name of the proprietary concern by any professional body incorporated under a statute. (g) Complete Income Tax Return (not just the acknowledgement) in the name of the sole proprietor where the firm's income is reflected, duly authenticated/acknowledged by the Income Tax authorities. (h) Utility bills such as electricity, water, and landline telephone bills.
17.    When the client accounts are opened by professional intermediaries: When the bank has knowledge or reason to believe that the client account opened by a professional intermediary is on behalf of a single client, that client must be identified. Banks may hold 'pooled' accounts managed by professional intermediaries on behalf of entities like mutual funds, pension funds or other types of funds. Banks, however, should not open accounts of such professional intermediaries who are bound by any client confidentiality that prohibits disclosure of the client details to the banks.
18.    Where funds held by the intermediaries are not co-mingled at the bank and there are 'sub-accounts', each of them attributable to a beneficial owner, all the beneficial owners must be identified. Where such funds are co-mingled at the bank, the bank should still look into the beneficial owners. Where the banks rely on the 'customer due diligence' (CDD) done by an intermediary, they should satisfy themselves that the intermediary is a regulated and supervised entity and has adequate systems in place to comply with the KYC requirements of the customers. It should be understood that the ultimate responsibility for knowing the customer lies with the bank.
19.    Beneficial ownership :When a bank/FI identifies a customer for opening an account, it should identify the beneficial owner(s) and take all reasonable steps in terms of Rule 9(3) of the PML Rules to verify his identity, as per guidelines provided below:
(a) Where the client is a company, the beneficial owner is the natural person(s), who, whether acting alone or together, or through one or more juridical person, has/have a controlling ownership interest or who exercises control through other meansExplanation- For the purpose of this sub-clause- 1. “Controlling ownership interest” means ownership of/entitlement to more than 25 per cent of the shares or capital or profits of the company. 2. “Control” shall include the right to appoint majority of the directors or to control the management or policy decisions including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting agreements.
(b)   Where the client is a partnership firm, the beneficial owner is the natural person(s), who, whether acting alone or together, or through one or more juridical person, has/have ownership of/entitlement to more than 15 per cent of capital or profits of the partnership.
(c)   Where the client is an unincorporated association or body of individuals, the beneficial owner is the natural person(s), who, whether acting alone or together, or through one or more juridical person, has/have ownership of/entitlement to more than 15 per cent of the property or capital or profits of the unincorporated association or body of individuals.
(d)   Where no natural person is identified under (a), (b) or (c) above, the beneficial owner is the relevant natural person who holds the position of senior managing official.
(e)   Where the client is a trust, the identification of beneficial owner(s) shall include identification of the author of the trust, the trustee, the beneficiaries with 15% or more interest in the trust and any other natural person. exercising ultimate effective control over the trust through a chain of control or ownership.
(f)  Where the client or the owner of the controlling interest is a company listed on a stock exchange, or is a subsidiary of such a company, it is not necessary to identify and verify the identity of any shareholder or beneficial owner of such companies.

20. KYC exercise should be done at least every two years for high risk customers, every eight years for medium risk customers and every ten years for low risk customers. Such KYC exercise may include all measures for confirming the identity and address and other particulars of the customer that the bank/FI may consider reasonable and necessary based on the risk profile of the customer, taking into account whether and when client due diligence measures were last undertaken and the adequacy of data obtained.

21.    Freezing and closure of accounts :
(i)   In case of non-compliance of KYC requirements by the customers despite repeated reminders by banks/FIs, banks/FIs may impose ‘partial freezing’ on such KYC non-compliant accounts in a phased manner.
(ii)   During the course of such partial freezing, the account holders can revive their accounts by submitting the KYC documents as per instructions in force.
(iii)   While imposing ‘partial freezing’, banks/FIs have to ensure that the option of ‘partial freezing’ is exercised after giving due notice of three months initially to the customers to comply with KYC requirements to be followed by a reminder giving a further period of three months.
(v)  (iv) Thereafter, banks/FIs may impose ‘partial freezing’ by allowing all credits and disallowing all debits with the freedom to close the accounts If the accounts are still KYC non-compliant after six months of imposing initial ‘partial freezing’ banks/FIs should disallow all debits and credits from/to the accounts thereby, rendering them inoperative.
(vi)  Further, it would always be open to the bank/FI to close the account of such customers after issuing due notice to the customer explaining the reasons for taking such a decision. Such decisions, however, need to be taken at a reasonably senior level. In the circumstances when a bank/FI believes that it would no longer be satisfied about the true identity of the account holder, the bank/FI should file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) with Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND) under Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.

22.                At-par cheque facility availed by co-operative banks : Some commercial banks have arrangements with co-operative banks under which the latter open current accounts with the commercial banks and use the cheque book facility to issue ‘at par’ cheques to their constituents and walk-in- customers for effecting their remittances and payments. Since theb‘at par’ cheque facility offered by commercial banks to co-operative banks is in the nature of correspondent banking arrangement, banks should monitor and review such arrangements to assess the risks including credit risk and reputational risk arising there from. For this purpose, banks should retain the right to verify the records maintained by the client cooperative banks/ societies for compliance with the extant instructions on KYC and AML under such arrangements.
23.    In this regard, Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) are advised to utilize the ‘at par’ cheque facility only for the following purposes:
(i)   For their own use.
(ii)   For their account holders who are KYC complaint provided that all transactions of Rs.50,000/- or more should be strictly by debit to the customer’s account.
(iii)   For walk-in customers against cash for less than Rs.50,000/- per individual. In order to utilise the ‘at par’ cheque facility in the above manner, UCBs should maintain the following:
(i)   Records pertaining to issuance of ‘at par’ cheques covering inter alia applicant’s name and account number, beneficiary’s details and date of issuance of the ‘at par’ cheque

. (ii)Sufficient balances/drawing arrangements with the commercial bank extending such facility for purpose of honouring such instruments. UCBs should also ensure that all ‘at par’ cheques issued by them are crossed ‘account payee’ irrespective of the amount involved.
30.    Simplified norms for Self Help Groups (SHGs) : KYC verification of all the members of SHG need not be done while opening the savings bank account of the SHG and KYC verification of all the office bearers would suffice. As regards KYC verification at the time of credit linking of SHGs, no separate KYC verification of the members or office bearers is necessary
31.    Walk-in Customer : In case of transactions carried out by a non-account based customer, that is a walk in customer, where the amount of transaction is equal to or exceeds Rs. 50,000/-, whether conducted as a single transaction or several transactions that appear to be connected, the customer's identity and address should be verified. If a bank has reason to believe that a customer is intentionally structuring a transaction into a series of transactions below the threshold of Rs.50,000/- the bank should verify the identity and address of the customer and also consider filing a Suspicious Transactions Report (STR) to Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND). In terms of Clause (b) (ii) of sub-Rule (1) of Rule 9 of the PML Rules, 2005 banks and financial institutions are required to verify the identity of the customers for all international money transfer operations.
32.    Issue of Demand Drafts, etc, for more than Rs.50,000/- : Banks should ensure that any remittance of funds by way of demand draft, mail/telegraphic transfer or any other mode and issue of travellers’ cheques for value of Rs.50,000/- and above is effected by debit to the customer’s account or against cheques and not against cash payment. Banks should not make payment of cheques/drafts/pay orders/banker’s cheques if they are presented beyond the period of three months from the date of such instrument.
33.    Unique Customer Identification Code : A Unique Customer Identification Code (UCIC) will help banks to identify the customers, avoid multiple identities, track the facilities availed, monitor financial transactions in a holistic manner and enable banks to have a better approach to risk profiling of customers. Banks have been advised to allot UCIC while entering into new relationships with individual customers as also the existing customers.
34.    Banks/FIs should put in place a system of periodical review of risk categorization of accounts and the need for applying enhanced due diligence measures. Such review of risk categorisation of customers should be carried out at a periodicity of not less than once in six months.
35.    Banks should closely monitor the transactions in accounts of marketing firms, especially accounts of Multi-level Marketing (MLM) Companies. Banks should analyse data in cases where a large number of cheque books are sought by the company, there are multiple small deposits (generally in cash) across the country in one bank account and where a large number of cheques are issued bearing similar amounts/dates. Where such features are noticed by the bank and in case they find such unusual operations in their accounts, the matter should be immediately reported to Reserve Bank and other appropriate authorities such as FIU-IND.
36.    Banks/FIs should exercise ongoing due diligence with respect to the business relationship with every client and closely examine the transactions in order to ensure that they are consistent with their knowledge about the clients, their business and risk profile and where necessary, the source of funds.
37.    The Board of Directors should ensure that an effective AML/CFT programme is in place by establishing appropriate procedures and ensuring their effective implementation. It should cover proper management oversight, systems and controls, segregation of duties, training of staff and other related matters.
38.    Customers who are likely to pose a higher than average risk should be categorised as medium or high risk depending on the background, nature and location of activity, country of origin, sources of funds, customer profile, etc. Customers requiring very high level of monitoring, e.g., those involved in cash intensive business, Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) of foreign origin, may, if considered necessary, be categorised as high risk.

39.    Correspondent banking is the provision of banking services by one bank (the “correspondent bank”) to another bank (the “respondent bank”). These services may include cash/funds management, international wire transfers, drawing arrangements for demand drafts and mail transfers, payable-through-accounts, cheques clearing etc.
40.    In case of payable-through-accounts, the correspondent bank should be satisfied that the respondent bank has verified the identity of the customers having direct access to the accounts and is undertaking ongoing 'due diligence' on them. The correspondent bank should ensure that the respondent bank is able to provide the relevant customer identification data immediately on request.
41.    Banks should ensure that their respondent banks have KYC/AML policies and procedures in place and apply enhanced 'due diligence' procedures for transactions carried out through the correspondent accounts. Banks should not enter into a correspondent relationship with a “shell bank” (i.e., a bank which is incorporated in a country where it has no physical presence and is not affiliated to any regulated financial group). The correspondent bank should not permit its accounts to be used by shell banks.
42.    Wire Transfer : Banks/FIs use wire transfers as an expeditious method for transferring funds between bank accounts. Wire transfers include transactions occurring within the national boundaries of a country or from one country to another. As wire transfers do not involve actual movement of currency, they are considered as rapid and secure method for transferring value from one location to another.
43.    (a) The salient features of a wire transfer transaction are as under: (i) Wire transfer is a transaction carried out on behalf of an originator person (both natural and legal) through a bank by electronic means with a view to making an amount of money available to a beneficiary person at a bank. The originator and the beneficiary could be the same person. (ii) Domestic wire transfer means any wire transfer where the originator and receiver are located in the same country. It may also include a chain of wire transfers that takes place entirely within the borders of a single country even though the system used to effect the wire transfer may be located in another country. (iii) Cross-border transfer means any wire transfer where the originator and the beneficiary bank or financial institutions are located in different countries. It may include any chain of wire transfers that has at least one cross-border element. (iv) The originator is the account holder, or where there is no account, the person (natural or legal) that places the order with the bank to perform the wire transfer.
44.    Accordingly, banks/FIs must ensure that all wire transfers are accompanied by the following information: 1. Cross-border wire transfers 2. Domestic wire transfers
45.    Cross-border wire transfers (i) All cross-border wire transfers must be accompanied by accurate and meaningful originator information. (ii) Information accompanying cross-border wire transfers must contain the name and address of the originator and where an account exists, the number of that account. In the absence of an account, a unique reference number, as prevalent in the country concerned, must be included. (iii) Where several individual transfers from a single originator are bundled in a batch file for transmission to beneficiaries in another country, they may be exempted from including full originator information, provided they include the originator’s account number or unique reference number as at (ii) above.
46.    Domestic wire transfers (i) Information accompanying all domestic wire transfers of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and above must include complete originator information i.e. name, address and account number etc., unless full originator information can be made available to the beneficiary bank by other means. (ii) If a bank has reason to believe that a customer is intentionally structuring wire transfer to below Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to several beneficiaries in order to avoid reporting or monitoring, the bank must insist on complete customer identification before effecting the transfer. In case of non-cooperation from the customer, efforts should be made to establish his identity and Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) should be made to FIU-IND. (iii) When a credit or debit card is used to effect money transfer, necessary information as at (i) above should be included in the message.


Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND)


Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND)
Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND) was set by the Government of India in 2004 as the central national agency responsible for receiving, processing, analyzing and disseminating information relating to suspect financial transactions. FIU-IND is also responsible for coordinating and strengthening efforts of national and international intelligence, investigation and enforcement agencies in pursuing the global efforts against money laundering and related crimes. FIU-IND is an independent body reporting directly to the Economic Intelligence Council (EIC) headed by the Finance Minister.
Functions of FIU-IND
The main function of FIU-IND is to receive cash/suspicious transaction reports, analyse them and, as appropriate, disseminate valuable financial information to intelligence/enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities . The functions of FIU-IND are:
Collection of Information: Act as the central reception point for receiving Cash Transaction reports (CTRs) and Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) from various reporting entities.
Analysis of Information: Analyze received information in order to uncover patterns of transactions suggesting suspicion of money laundering and related crimes.
Sharing of Information: Share information with national intelligence/law enforcement agencies, national regulatory authorities and foreign Financial Intelligence Units.
Act as Central Repository: Establish and maintain national data base on cash  transactions and suspicious transactions on the basis of reports received from reporting entities.
Coordination: Coordinate and strengthen collection and sharing of financial intelligence through an effective national, regional and global network to combat money laundering and related crimes.
Research and Analysis: Monitor and identify strategic key areas on money laundering trends, typologies and developments.
Organisational Set-up
FIU-IND is a multi disciplinary body headed by a Director. Personnel in this Unit are being inducted from different organizations namely Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Department of Legal Affairs and Intelligence agencies.
Authorities at FIU-IND
According to Section 48 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 there shall be the following classes of authorities for the purposes of this Act, namely:-
(a) Director or Additional Director or Joint Director,
(b) Deputy Director,
(c) Assistant Director, and
(d) such other class of officers as may be appointed for the purposes of this Act.
Appointment of Authorities
As per Section 49 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002:
(1) The Central Government may appoint such persons as it thinks fit to be authorities for the purposes of this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Central Government may authorise the Director or an Additional Director or a Joint Director or a Deputy Director or an Assistant Director appointed under that sub-section to appoint other authorities below the rank of an Assistant Director.
(3) Subject to such conditions and limitations as the Central Government may impose, an authority may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on it under this Act.
Director and officers subordinate to him deemed to be public servants Section 40 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 declares the Chairperson, Members  and other officers and employees of the Appellate Tribunal, the Adjudicating
Authority, Director and the officers subordinate to him shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860).
Powers of the Director
Section 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 confers following powers on the Director to ensure compliance:
(1) The Director may, either of his own motion or on an application made by any authority, officer or person, call for records referred to in sub-section (1) of section 12 and may make such inquiry or cause such inquiry to be made, as he thinks fit.
(2) If the Director, in the course of any inquiry, finds that a banking company, financial institution or an intermediary or any of its officers has failed to comply with the provisions contained in section 12, then, without prejudice to any other action that may be taken under any other provisions of this Act, he may, by an order, levy a fine on such banking company
or financial institution or intermediary which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but may extend to one lakh rupees for each failure.
(3) The Director shall forward a copy of the order passed under sub-section (2) to every banking company, financial institution or intermediary or person who is a party to the proceedings under that sub-section. Powers of authorities regarding summons, production of documents and to give evidence: Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 confers following powers of summons, production of documents and to give evidence etc.:
(1) The Director shall, for the purposes of section 13, have the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:-
(a) discovery and inspection;
(b) enforcing the attendance of any person, including any officer of a banking company,
financial institution or a company, and examining him on oath;
(c) compelling the production of records;
(d) receiving evidence on affidavits;
(e) issuing commissions for examination of witnesses and documents; and
(f) any other matter which may be prescribed
(2) The Director, Additional Director, Joint Director, Deputy Director or Assistant Director shall have power to summon any person whose attendance he considers necessary whether to give evidence or to produce any records during the course of any investigation or proceeding under this Act.
(3) All the persons so summoned shall be bound to attend in person or through authorized agents, as such officer may direct, and shall be bound to state the truth upon any subject which they are examined or make statements, and produce such documents as may be required.
(4) Every proceeding under sub-sections (2) and (3) shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860).
(5) Subject to any rules made in this behalf by the Central Government, any officer referred to in sub-section (2) may impound and retain in his custody for such period, as he thinks fit, any records produced before him in any proceedings under this Act:
Provided that an Assistant Director or a Deputy Director shall not -
(a) impound any records without recording his reasons for so doing; or
(b) retain in his custody any such records for a period exceeding three months, without obtaining the prior approval of the Director. Assistance from other authorities for enforcement of the Act Section 54 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 empowers and requires various authorities to assist in the enforcement of the act. The following officers are empowered and required to assist the authorities in the enforcement of this Act, namely:-
(a) officers of the Customs and Central Excise Departments;
(b) officers appointed under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985);
(c) income-tax authorities under sub-section (1) of section 117 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961);
(d) officers of the stock exchange recognised under section 4 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956);
(e) officers of the Reserve Bank of India constituted under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934);
(f) officers of Police;
(g) officers of enforcement appointed under sub-section (1) of section 36 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1973 (40 of 1999);
(h) officers of the Securities and Exchange Board of India established under section 3 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992);
(i) officers of any other body corporate constituted or established under a Central Act or a State Act;
(j) such other officers of the Central Government, State Government, local authorities or banking companies as the Central Government may, by notification, specify, in this behalf.
Agreements with foreign countries
Section 56 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides for agreements with foreign countries to facilitate exchange of information with them:
(1) The Central Government may enter into an agreement with the Government of any country outside India for-
(a) enforcing the provisions of this Act;
(b) exchange of information for the prevention of any offence under this Act or under the
corresponding law in force in that country or investigation of cases relating to any offence under this Act. and may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make such provisions as may be necessary for implementing the agreement.
(2) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that the application of this Chapter in relation to a contracting State with which reciprocal arrangements have been made, shall be subject to such conditions, exceptions or qualifications as are specified in the said notification.
Disclosure of information
Section 66 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides for disclosure of information to other officers, authority or body:
The Director or any other authority specified by him by a general or special order in this behalf may furnish or cause to be furnished to-
(i) any officer, authority or body performing any functions under any law relating to imposition of any tax, duty or cess or to dealings in foreign exchange, or prevention of illicit traffic in the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985); or
(ii) such other officer, authority or body performing functions under any other law as the Central Government may, if in its opinion it is necessary so to do in the public interest, specify by notification in the Official Gazette in this behalf, any information received or obtained by such Director or any other authority, specified by him in the performance of their functions under this Act, as may, in the opinion of the Director or the other authority so specified by him, be necessary for the purpose of the officer, authority or body specified in clause (i) or clause (ii) to perform his or its functions under that law.

Recovery of fines
Section 69 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 refers to recovery of fines. Where any fine imposed on any person under section 13 or section 63 is not paid within six months from the day of imposition of fine, the Director or any other officer authorised by him in this behalf may proceed to recover the amount from the said person in the same manner as
prescribed in Schedule 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) for the recovery of arrears and he or any officer authorised by him in this behalf shall have all the powers of the Tax Recovery Officer mentioned in the said Schedule for the said purpose. The new network, called FINnet (Financial Intelligence Network), is a technology-based secure platform for bringing together investigative and enforcement agencies to collect, analyse and disseminate valuable financial information for combating money laundering and related crimes.
Restriction on Civil Court Jurisdiction
Section 41 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 says that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which the Director, an Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect
of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act."
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 deals with appeal to Appellate
Tribunal.
(1) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (3), the Director or any person aggrieved by an order made by the Adjudicating Authority under this Act, may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(2) Any banking company, financial institution or intermediary aggrieved by any order of the Director made under sub-section (2) of section 13, may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(3) Every appeal preferred under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be filed within a period of forty-five days from the date on which a copy of the order made by the Adjudicating Authority or Director is received and it shall be in such form and be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed:
Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may, after giving an opportunity of being heard, entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of forty-five days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.
(4) On receipt of an appeal under sub-section (1), or sub-section (2), the Appellate Tribunal may, after giving the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against.
(5) The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made


Right of Appellant
Section 39 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides for the right of the appellant.
(1) A person preferring an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under this Act may either appear in person or take the assistance of an authorised representative of his choice to present his case before the Appellate Tribunal.
Explanation - For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "authorized representative" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it under sub-section (2) of section 288 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
(2) The Central Government or the Director may authorise one or more authorized representatives or any of its officers to act as presenting officers and every person so authorised may present the case with respect to any appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal to High Court
Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides for appeal to High Court:
“Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal to him on any question of law or fact arising out of such order: Provided that the High Court may, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the said period, allow it to be filed within a further period not exceeding sixty days.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, "High Court" means-
(i) the High Court within the jurisdiction of which the aggrieved party ordinarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain; and
(ii) where the Central Government is the aggrieved party, the High Court within the jurisdiction of which the respondent, or in a case where there are more than one respondent, any of the respondents, ordinarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain.
Offences which can be seen by Special Courts
Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides for trial by Special Courts:
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),-
a. the schedule offence and the offence punishable under section 4 shall be tried only by the Special Court constituted for the area in which the offence has been committed; Provided that the Special Court , trying a schedule offence before the commencement of this Act, shall continue to try such scheduled offence, or
b. a Special Court may, upon a complaint made by an authority authorised in this behalf under this Act take cognizance of the offence for which the accused is committed to it for trial.
(2) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to affect the special powers of the High Court regarding bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) and the High Court may exercise such powers including the power under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of that section as if the reference to "Magistrate" in that section includes also a reference to a "Special Court" designated under section 43.